Çevresel ve Sürdürülebilirlik Zorlukları Bağlamında Kurumsal Yönetişim ve Finansal Performans: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz (2015-2025)

Çevresel ve Sürdürülebilirlik Zorlukları Bağlamında Kurumsal Yönetişim ve Finansal Performans: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz (2015-2025)

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20962556

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Finansal Performans, Sürdürülebilirlik

Özet

yönetim ile finansal performans arasındaki ilişkinin bilimsel literatürdeki gelişimini sistematik ve metodik bir biçimde haritalandırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, yönetişim mekanizmalarının sürdürülebilirlik baskılarına nasıl uyum sağladığını ve bu uyumun firmaların finansal sonuçları ile uzun vadeli dayanıklılığı üzerindeki etkilerini açıklamayı hedeflemektedir.

Tasarım/veri/metodoloji – Bu çalışmada, Scopus veri tabanından elde edilen 609 hakemli makaleden oluşan bir veri setine dayanan bibliyometrik bir araştırma tasarımı benimsenmiştir. Alanın yayın eğilimlerini ve entelektüel yapısını ortaya koymak amacıyla ortak atıf analizi, ortak yazarlık analizi ve anahtar kelime (co-word) analizi gibi bilimsel haritalama teknikleri kullanılmıştır.

Bulgular – Bulgular, yıllık %37,02 oranında güçlü ve doğrusal olmayan bir büyüme hızına işaret etmekte ve özellikle 2019 sonrasında sürdürülebilirlik odaklı yönetişime yönelik küresel yönelimi yansıtan belirgin bir ivmelenme göstermektedir. Bilgi üretiminin coğrafyası çok kutuplu bir yapı sergilemekte olup, Çin uluslararası araştırma iş birliği ağında açık biçimde merkezi bir düğüm olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Tematik evrim analizi, kavramsal perspektiflerde paradigmatik bir dönüşüme işaret etmekte; yönetişimin parçalı yaklaşımlardan ESG ile uyumlu bütünleşik yaklaşımlara doğru evrildiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Özgünlük/değer – Bu çalışma, hızla genişleyen bir araştırma alanına ilişkin özlü ve sistematik bir bibliyometrik sentez sunmakta; alanın entelektüel ve tematik evrimini netleştirmekte ve kurumsal yönetimin çevresel ve sürdürülebilirlik zorlukları altında yalnızca prosedürel bir işlev olmaktan çıkarak finansal değerin temel belirleyicilerinden biri hâline geldiğini göstermektedir.

Referanslar

Aboud, A., & Diab, A. (2018). The impact of social, environmental and corporate governance disclosures on firm value: evidence from Egypt. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(4), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-08-2017-0079

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291‑309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007

Adu, D. A., Abedin, M. Z., Saa, V. Y., & Boateng, F. (2024). Bank sustainability, climate change initiatives and financial performance: the role of corporate governance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103438

Alareeni, BA., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance, 20(7), 1409–1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0258

Albuquerque, R. A., Koskinen, Y. J. and Zhang, C., (2018). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence (November 16, 2018). Forthcoming in Management Science, DOI/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043, WBS Finance Group Research Paper No. 259, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3286367

Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217‑235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767

Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 1027–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277‑297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29‑51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D

Atan, R., Alam, MM., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: panel study of malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033

Barnea, A., Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z

Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159336

Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304‑1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1980

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99‑120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Bear, S., Rahman, N. & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2

Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: the divergence of esg ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315‑1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033

Chytis, E., Eriotis, N., & Mitroulia, M. (2024). ESG in business research: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(10), 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17100460

Cosma, S., Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., & Rimo, G. (2024). Banks’ fossil fuel divestment and corporate governance: the role of board gender diversity. Energy Economics, 139, 107948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107948

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887

Elmanaseer, M. I., & Gerged, A. M. (2025). How do institutional pressures reshape the association between corporate sustainability disclosure and firm value in emerging economies? the moderating role of the audit committee function. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(6), 7253‑7283. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4340

Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 135‑147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180

Gonçalves, T. C., Dias, J., & Barros, V. (2022). Sustainability performance and the cost of capital. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(3), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10030063

Hazaea, S. A., Cai, C., Khatib, S. F. A., & Hael, M. (2025). The moderating role of audit quality in the relationship between ESG practices and the cost of capital: evidence from the United Kingdom. Borsa Istanbul Review, 25(5), 1085‑1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2025.06.007

Imran, M., Liu, X., Arif, M., Rahman, S. U., Manan, F., Khattak, S. R., & Wang, R. (2023). Sustainable corporate governance mediates between firm performance and corporate social responsibility using structural equation modelling. Frontiers in Energy Research, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1121853

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305‑360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Lin, Z. (2024). Does ESG performance indicate corporate economic sustainability? evidence based on the sustainable growth rate. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(3), 485‑493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.02.010

Marzuki, A., Nor, F. M., Ramli, N. A., Basah, M. Y. A., & Aziz, M. R. A. (2023). The influence of esg, sri, ethical, and impact investing activities on portfolio and financial performance—bibliometric analysis/mapping and clustering analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(7), 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16070321

Naciti, V. (2019). Corporate governance and board of directors: the effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727

Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341

Patekar, A., & Mahajan, S. (2025). Unraveling the ESG-firm value nexus: a systematic analysis of current literature and emerging themes. Business Performance Review, 3(2), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.22495/bprv3i2p5

Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: the role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137‑151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001

Sahu, M., Alahdal, W. M., Pandey, D. K., Baatwah, S. R., & Bajaher, M. S. (2025). Board gender diversity and firm performance: unveiling the ESG effect. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100493

Sciarelli, M., Landi, G., Turriziani, L., & Prisco, A. (2024). Does corporate sustainability mitigate firm risk? an empirical analysis on S&P 500 controversial companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2021-0388

Shah, S. S. H., Basit, A., Ahmed, S., Khan, M. A., & Tangl, A. (2024). Board composition, ESG practices, and firm performance: evidence from the Pakistan stock exchange. The Economics and Finance Letters, 11(2), 146‑162. https://doi.org/10.18488/29.v11i2.3765

Shaikh, I. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practice and firm performance: international evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.16202

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286‑300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224

Yayınlanmış

2025-06-30

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Kouini , C., & Guettala, A. (2025). Çevresel ve Sürdürülebilirlik Zorlukları Bağlamında Kurumsal Yönetişim ve Finansal Performans: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz (2015-2025). Journal of Economics, Finance and Sustainability, 4(1), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20962556

Benzer Makaleler

1 2 3 > >> 

Bu makale için ayrıca gelişmiş bir benzerlik araması başlat yapabilirsiniz.

Loading...